Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Disclosure Act (2023 or 2024 version).

1. Presumption of Disclosure
   Government records concerning UAPs (or technologies of unknown origin, and non-human intelligence) would carry a default presumption that they should be disclosed publicly, unless there is a compelling national security justification not to. Wikipedia+4newparadigminstitute.org+4Senate Democratic Leadership+4
   
   

2. Centralized Collection at the National Archives
   The amendment would establish a dedicated UAP Records Collection at the National Archives, where all relevant federal records would be cataloged, preserved, and, where allowable, released to the public. Inside Government Contracts+5Senate Democratic Leadership+5Senate Democratic Leadership+5
   
   

3. Review Board & Oversight Mechanisms
   The proposal envisions an independent Review Board composed of non-partisan experts that would evaluate whether records should be disclosed or, in some cases, postponed (i.e., withheld or redacted) under strict criteria. Inside Government Contracts+3Senate Democratic Leadership+3newparadigminstitute.org+3
   
   

4. Controlled Disclosure Plan
   For records whose full disclosure might be harmful (e.g. revealing sensitive intelligence methods or national security secrets), there’d be mechanisms for postponement, but with periodic review and obligations to downgrade or declassify over time. NYU Journal of Legislation+3Senate Democratic Leadership+3newparadigminstitute.org+3
   
   

5. Sunset Limits / Time Limits on Withholding
   The amendment generally sets a maximum period (e.g. 25 years) after which records must be fully disclosed unless there is a certifiable, serious national security reason to continue withholding.

Strengths, Criticisms, and Limitations

Strengths / Potential Benefits:

• It would force greater accountability and oversight of governmental UAP programs.

• It establishes a structured, legal pathway for declassification and public access.

• The presumption of disclosure sets a stronger standard than the current system, which often errs toward secrecy.
  
  

Criticisms / Weaknesses:

• The “postponement” and “national security” exemptions can be broad, giving agencies room to withhold or heavily redact sensitive records.
  Private contractors and non-government entities that hold UAP-related materials may have less obligation to comply, especially if the law doesn’t impose strong enforcement powers on them.
  Implementation and timely disclosure may be slow, due to resource constraints and bureaucratic resistance.

• 
  Some analysts argue that, in practice, many records may remain hidden or heavily redacted, so the law might not deliver full “disclosure” in a way satisfaction-minded UFO / UAP proponents hope.

 The name Strokeonaut  is a fun play on the word astronaut—because just like space explorers, stroke survivors venture into the unknown, facing uncharted challenges with courage, curiosity, and resilience. It felt like the right time for a name that honors that bold journey.